A recent study of used crack pipes in Ottawa by a University of Victoria Professor determined it is possible to transmit Hepatitis C via crack pipes. (Link) The reaction from Mayor Larry O'Brien was he would have to see data that suggest the city program caused addicts to avoid sharing crack pipes before he would change his mind. This despite the fact that another study found that sharing of crack pipes actually decreased due to the program. Despite the study, this blog post isn't going to go in the expected direction. I think, despite the recent study, the city of Ottawa's decision to cancel the crack pipe program was the right decision.
I however don't think the decision on City council was made for the right reasons. Rather than admitting certain scientific facts such as "this program reduces the spread of diseases" you see an attempt by many on council to refute the scientific evidence or dismiss it. Overall on matters of medical science I am much more willing to trust a medical doctor or researcher than Jan Harder or Larry O'Brien. Elected officials should accept scientific evidence as fact and not try to interpret it for their own political purposes. This is a continual problem we see in the USA regarding sex ed and evolution and now it infiltrates our own little corner of the world. I think those on council, Mayor O'Brien included, who voted against the program should be intellectually honest and admit certain consequences regarding their actions. Admitting those consequences doesn't mean you made the wrong decision.
Personally, I believe the program should have been canceled because I don't believe it is always the governments responsibility to engage in any program simply because it reduces immediate harms. I fully recognize that more people may well get certain communicable diseases due to the cancellation. I think there are greater long-term problems with having a government essentially promote drug use. Anyway I perhaps will make a longer post on exactly why I don't like crack pipes.